Introduction
Carl Zillich
In 2010, H.O.M.E. magazine published an 11-page report on a residential house by a young Italian architect in Spain. The designer and photographer featured was Antonino Cardillo, a 37-year-old Roman architect who had previously been named one of the 30 most important young architects in Wallpaper* magazine. He had successfully provided numerous media with his designs, as the extensive list of publications on his website shows. However, the images were perfect photorealistic rendering [CGI]. In May, the Viennese newspaper Falter addressed the major bluff with “Schöner Klonen” (Peter Reischer). In August, Der Spiegel picked up the story and directly confronted Cardillo with allegations of deception. Further press articles and online discussions followed. Cardillo was typically discussed as a person—like Felix Krull (Spiegel) or “Master of Illusions” (NZZ)—but never as a system.
Cardillo, who meticulously lists all these press reports on his website, only holds up a mirror to architectural media and points out a fundamental problem: How can young architects find clients without having been published? Yet, as long as there is no built work to show, no publication is in sight. A vicious circle that can only be broken with skilful bluffing or—professionally phrased—with PR talent. The tectonic precariat around Cardillo & Co benefits from a remarkable schizophrenia of architectural press: While most magazines today only want to publish realised projects, they increasingly consider original reporting unnecessary. Instead of paying authors to visit buildings and write authentic reviews based on their own experience, many editorial offices fabricate articles purely from press releases by architects and the images they provide. But since photographers often no longer shoot analog, their product is just as digital as an architect’s render file.
And it is precisely this weak spot between real representation and virtual anticipation of architecture that Cardillo has exploited. Another variant of professional bluffing is the method of joining forces with all his friends under one label, putting all (study) projects on a website and presenting themselves as global players. Naturally, it has always been part of the architects’ business to present themselves as bigger than they are. Buildings like Tegel Airport or the VPRO television studio would otherwise never have been built, and the respective architectural firms might have developed in completely different ways. However, the Cardillo case makes it clear that the situation has intensified: What circumstances force architects today to create such elaborate deceptions? Should Cardillo be celebrated as a martyr of the young generation in the industry rather than scolded as a poor liar? Is his ‘Data Mirage’ ultimately nothing but self-defence in the face of the largely hopeless professional situation of young architects? Professional disobedience as a legitimate survival tactic? In a word: Can we still do without deception?
PS: The editors also invited Antonino Cardillo to comment here with a statement. He politely declined, as he does not wish to influence the discussion further.

Antonino Cardillo, Ellipse 1501 House, Rome, 2007.